Smith v. Heath C. Nicholas et al
| Jerod Matthew Smith |
| Artee Williams, Professional Credit Management, Inc., Arkansas Office of Child Support Enforcement, The, Timothy J. Leathers, Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration, Heath C. Nicholas, Paulette Nicholas and United States Internal Revenue Service |
| United States Internal Revenue Service |
| Jerod Matthew Smith |
| 3:2011cv03035 |
| May 10, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Harrison Office |
| Boone |
| Jimm Larry Hendren |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on November 20, 2012. (lw)
|
|
Filing
25
DECREE of Foreclosure in Rem in amount of $75,115.29, including principal. Interest accrued to 8/12/12, late charges, collection costs, together with attorney's fees and costs in the amount of $7,165.00, for a total judgment amount of $82,280.29. That said amount shall bear 0.19% interest rate of judgment. If judgment not paid within ten days, terms and conditions for judicial sale are set forth. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on August 21, 2012. (lw) Modified text on 8/21/2012 (ee).
|
|
Filing
21
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on April 17, 2012. (lw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
