Taylor v. Midnight Express Books et al
Kirell Taylor |
Midnight Express Books and Linda Huddleston |
3:2011cv03128 |
December 7, 2011 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Harrison Office |
U.S., Outside State |
P. K. Holmes |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 ORDER DENYING 24 Motion to Reopen Case. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on July 9, 2013. Copy of order mailed to non-CM/ECT participant. (jas) |
Filing 22 ORDER denying 21 Request for Production of Documents filed by Kirell Taylor. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on February 7, 2013. Copy of order mailed to non CM/ECF participant. (jas) |
Filing 20 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety. The Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status pursuant to the prison Litigation Reform Act is hereby REVOKED, and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff's right to re-open the case with payment of the appropriate filing fee. Further any and all motions which remain pending are DISMISSED AS MOOT. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on April 11, 2012. (lw) |
Filing 12 ORDER finding that the interests of justice would best be served by transferring this case, the Clerk is directed to transfer this case immediately to the USDC for the Western District of Arkansas, Harrison Division. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 12/6/11. (vjt) [Transferred from ared on 12/7/2011.] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.