Sayres v. Felts et al
| Robert Sayres |
| Jamin B. Martin, Mike Moore, John Felts and Robert Cutbroth |
| 3:2013cv03096 |
| October 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Harrison Office |
| Boone |
| Jimm Larry Hendren |
| James R. Marschewski |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
AMENDED AND SUBSTITUTED ORDER denying 32 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; denying 31 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 36 Motion to Amend Case and ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on March 6, 2014. (tg)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER denying 31 Motion for Reconsideration; adopting 33 Report and Recommendations and denying 36 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on March 4, 2014. (adw)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER ADOPTING IN TOTO 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and plaintiff's objections are overruled; further denying 3 Motion for Hearing; denying 4 Motion for Hearing; denying 7 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 7 Motion for Jury Trial; denying 14 Motion for Order; denying 16 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 16 Motion for Jury Trial; denying 17 Motion ; denying 18 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 20 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 22 Motion to Amend/Correct and case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on January 23, 2014. (rw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
