Gatlin v. Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction

Plaintiff: Perry Joe Gatlin
Defendant: Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Case Number: 3:2014cv03024
Filed: March 6, 2014
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Harrison Office
County: Boone
Presiding Judge: Timothy L. Brooks
Referring Judge: James R. Marschewski
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 12, 2014 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and dismissing case with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on November 12, 2014. (tg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gatlin v. Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Represented By: Kathryn Elizabeth Henry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Perry Joe Gatlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?