Spence v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Plaintiff: Marion D. Spence, II
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Case Number: 3:2017cv03074
Filed: September 1, 2017
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Harrison Office
County: Baxter
Presiding Judge: Timothy L. Brooks
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 45:151
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 27, 2018 29 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer and Union Pacific's Answer at Doc. 8 will be deemed timely filed. Accordingly, Plaintiff Marion D. Spence II's Motion for Default Judgment on Liability and Request for Hearing on Damages Doc. 14 is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on March 27, 2018. (rg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spence v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marion D. Spence, II
Represented By: William Z. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?