Norman v. State of Arkansas

Petitioner: Dinzel E. Norman
Respondent: State of Arkansas
Case Number: 3:2017cv03077
Filed: September 14, 2017
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Harrison Office
County: Baxter
Presiding Judge: Timothy L. Brooks
Referring Judge: Mark E. Ford
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 4, 2018 15 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER 14 adopting Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody Doc. 1 should be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, a request for Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on January 4, 2018. (rg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Norman v. State of Arkansas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dinzel E. Norman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Arkansas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?