Veritiv Operating Company v. Sigma Supply of North America, Inc. et al
| Veritiv Operating Company |
| Sigma Supply of North America, Inc. and Jon Christopher Shaddy |
| 3:2018cv03092 |
| August 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Timothy L Brooks |
| Mark E Ford |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1330 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Veritiv Operating Company. Sigma Supply of North America, Inc. served on 9/20/2018, answer due 10/11/2018. (Hattabaugh, Rebecca) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel P. Hart on behalf of Veritiv Operating Company. (Hart, Daniel) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Cartron Stevens on behalf of Veritiv Operating Company. (Stevens, Robert) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Bart Calhoun on behalf of Jon Christopher Shaddy. (Calhoun, Bart) |
| Filing 11 TEXT ONLY ORDER GRANTING #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. ROBERT C. STEVENS is directed to immediately register for Pro Hac Vice filer access through PACER if he has not already done so and enter his appearance in this matter; AND GRANTING #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. DANIEL P. HART is directed to immediately register for Pro Hac Vice filer access through PACER if he has not already done so and enter his appearance in this matter. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on October 16, 2018. (slc) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Attorney Daniel P. Hart to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Veritiv Operating Company (PHV Application Fee paid, receipt #5006851). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing)(lgd) Modified on 10/11/2018 to add text (tg). |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Attorney Robert C. Stevens to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Veritiv Operating Company (PHV Application Fee paid, receipt #5006851). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(lgd) Modified on 10/11/2018 to add text (tg). |
| CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #9 MOTION for Attorney Robert C. Stevens to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You MUST pay the filing fee of $ 100.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 10/12/2018 (lgd) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #10 MOTION for Attorney Daniel P. Hart to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You MUST pay the filing fee of $ 100.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 10/12/2018 (lgd) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Sigma Supply of North America, Inc..(Baker, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Hearing set for 11/27/2018 09:00 AM in Fayetteville -- 5th flr (Rm 509) before Honorable Timothy L. Brooks. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/13/2018. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on October 9, 2018. (slc) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Jon Christopher Shaddy.(Richardson, Scott) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Veritiv Operating Company. Jon Christopher Shaddy served on 9/14/2018, answer due 10/5/2018. (Hattabaugh, Rebecca) |
| Filing 4 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to Jon Christopher Shaddy, and Sigma Supply of North America, Inc. and returned to attorney or plaintiff for service. YOU MUST PRINT THIS ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH IS THE MAIN DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (lgd) |
| Complaint fee received: $ 400, receipt number 5006821. (lgd) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Furnished. (lgd) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Veritiv Operating Company. (lgd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jon Christopher Shaddy, Sigma Supply of North America, Inc., filed by Veritiv Operating Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(lgd) |
| TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE re Multiple Attorneys Listed on Pleading directed to Plaintiff Veritiv Operating Company. Complaint #1 lists multiple attorneys appearing for the filer. The following attorney(s), who did not sign the pleading, must enter a separate Notice of Appearance in order to receive electronic notification of future activity in the case: Robert Stevens. (lgd) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #1 Complaint. You MUST pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 9/4/2018 (lgd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
