Baker v. Parker et al
| Dylan Jay Baker |
| Hattie Parker, Jim Henry and Kimberly Lupinacci |
| 3:2023cv03053 |
| December 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Timothy L Brooks |
| Mark E Ford |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (bjb) |
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Arkansas Eastern; Case Number 4:23-cv-01178. Docket sheet received. |
Filing 3
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to immediately transfer Plaintiff's entire case file to the Western District of Arkansas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 12/14/2023. (llg) [Transferred from ared on 12/14/2023.]
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED to Honorable Mark E. Ford: #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Dylan Jay Baker. Motions referred to Honorable Mark E. Ford.(bjb) |
| TEXT ONLY NOTICE: COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) transferred in from Eastern District of Arkansas. (bjb) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Dylan Jay Baker. (llg) [Transferred from ared on 12/14/2023.] |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dylan Jay Baker. (llg) [Transferred from ared on 12/14/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
