Pitcher v. Avant, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Cleveland Pitcher
Defendant: Avant, LLC and Equifax Information Services, LLC
Case Number: 3:2024cv03020
Filed: April 11, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Timothy L Brooks
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2024 Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (ria)
April 11, 2024 Filing 3 STATE COURT COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Avant, LLC, and Equifax Information Services, LLC, filed by Cleveland Pitcher.(ria)
April 11, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Marion County, Arkansas, case number 45CV-24-23., filed by Avant, LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint with exhibits A through D)(ria)
April 11, 2024 Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Avant, LLC. (ria)
April 11, 2024 Notice of Removal filing fee paid re #2 Notice of Removal : $ 405, receipt number AARWDC-2959812.. (Miller, Lance)
April 11, 2024 CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #2 Notice of Removal. You MUST pay the filing fee of $ 405.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 4/15/2024 (ria)
April 11, 2024 TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE to Local Counsel, Caitlin M. Smith, representing Plaintiff(s) in Removal Cases: The following attorney(s) listed on the State Court Complaint is/are not registered for CM/ECF noticing and filing in the Western District of Arkansas: Caitlin M. Smith. An attorney can register for a CM/ECF login and password if they are admitted to practice in the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas or are admitted pro hac vice for this case. Any non-registered attorney should submit the proper attorney admission petition or file an appropriate motion. Please refer to Local Rule 83.5 and the Administrative Policies and Procedures Manualfor Civil and Criminal Filings for further information. (ria)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pitcher v. Avant, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cleveland Pitcher
Represented By: Caitlin M. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Avant, LLC
Represented By: Eric Berger
Represented By: Lance R. Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Equifax Information Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?