Luxpro Corporation v. Apple, Inc.
Plaintiff Luxpro Corporation alleged that Defendant Apple, Inc. engaged in a scheme to interfere with Plaintiff\'s existing and prospective business relations and monopolize the worldwide MP3 market. Specifically, Plaintiff alleged that Defendant pressured Plaintiff\'s business partners and published false statements concerning Plaintiff\'s products and business.
Docket Report
We have record of the following docket entries for this case:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
July 7, 2010 | Remark - Case transferred thru civil case extract (cnn) | |
July 7, 2010 | 83 |
![]() |
July 7, 2010 | 82 | MANDATE (USCA) RE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS granting as to 57 Petition for Writ of Mandamus Notice (USCA) filed by Apple, Inc. and directing the district court to transfer this action to the Northern District of California. (Attachments: # 1 USCA Judgment, # 2 USCA Opinion)(cap) |
June 17, 2010 |
![]() |
|
June 16, 2010 | 81 |
![]() |
April 29, 2010 | 80 |
![]() |
April 29, 2010 | 79 |
![]() |
April 29, 2010 | 78 |
![]() |
April 29, 2010 | 77 |
![]() |
April 13, 2010 |
![]() |
|
April 8, 2010 | 76 |
![]() |
March 29, 2010 | 75 |
![]() |
March 29, 2010 | 74 |
![]() |
March 20, 2010 |
![]() |
|
March 19, 2010 | 73 |
![]() |
March 12, 2010 |
![]() |
|
March 11, 2010 | 72 |
![]() |
March 8, 2010 | 71 |
![]() |
March 1, 2010 | 70 |
![]() |
February 26, 2010 | 69 |
![]() |
February 26, 2010 | 68 |
![]() |
February 26, 2010 | 67 |
![]() |
February 26, 2010 | 66 |
![]() |
February 19, 2010 | 65 |
![]() |
January 28, 2010 |
![]() |
|
January 26, 2010 | 64 |
![]() |
January 7, 2010 |
![]() |
|
January 6, 2010 | 63 |
![]() |
December 29, 2009 | 62 |
![]() |
December 22, 2009 | 61 |
![]() |
December 22, 2009 | 60 |
![]() |
December 7, 2009 | 59 |
![]() |
December 7, 2009 | 58 |
![]() |
November 20, 2009 | 57 |
![]() |
November 20, 2009 |
![]() |
|
November 19, 2009 | 56 |
![]() |
October 30, 2009 |
![]() |
|
October 29, 2009 | 55 |
![]() |
October 28, 2009 | 54 |
![]() |
October 13, 2009 | 53 |
![]() |
October 8, 2009 |
![]() |
|
October 8, 2009 | 52 |
![]() |
October 7, 2009 | 51 |
![]() |
September 28, 2009 | 50 |
![]() |
September 28, 2009 | 49 |
![]() |
September 28, 2009 | 48 |
![]() |
September 25, 2009 |
![]() |
|
September 4, 2009 |
![]() |
|
September 2, 2009 | 47 |
![]() |
September 1, 2009 | 46 |
![]() |
August 26, 2009 |
![]() |
|
August 24, 2009 | 45 |
![]() |
July 2, 2009 |
![]() |
|
July 1, 2009 | 44 |
![]() |
May 27, 2009 | 43 |
![]() |
May 27, 2009 | 42 |
![]() |
April 27, 2009 | 41 |
![]() |
April 27, 2009 | 40 |
![]() |
April 6, 2009 | 39 |
![]() |
April 6, 2009 | 38 |
![]() |
April 6, 2009 | 37 |
![]() |
March 27, 2009 |
![]() |
|
March 24, 2009 | 36 |
![]() |
March 24, 2009 | 35 |
![]() |
March 2, 2009 | 34 |
![]() |
March 2, 2009 | 33 |
![]() |
February 17, 2009 |
![]() |
|
February 17, 2009 | 32 |
![]() |
February 3, 2009 |
![]() |
|
January 30, 2009 | 31 |
![]() |
January 22, 2009 | 30 |
![]() |
December 19, 2008 | 29 |
![]() |
December 19, 2008 | 28 |
![]() |
December 19, 2008 | 27 |
![]() |
December 19, 2008 | 26 |
![]() |
December 19, 2008 | 25 |
![]() |
December 19, 2008 | 24 |
![]() |
December 19, 2008 | 23 |
![]() |
November 19, 2008 | 22 |
![]() |
November 19, 2008 | 21 |
![]() |
November 17, 2008 | 20 |
![]() |
November 14, 2008 | 19 |
![]() |
November 14, 2008 | 18 |
![]() |
November 13, 2008 |
![]() |
|
November 13, 2008 |
![]() |
|
November 12, 2008 | 17 |
![]() |
November 12, 2008 | 16 |
![]() |
November 12, 2008 | 15 |
![]() |
November 12, 2008 |
![]() |
|
November 11, 2008 | 14 |
![]() |
November 10, 2008 | 13 |
![]() |
November 10, 2008 | 12 |
![]() |
October 29, 2008 | 11 |
![]() |
October 28, 2008 | 10 |
![]() |
October 27, 2008 |
![]() |
|
October 27, 2008 | 9 |
![]() |
October 24, 2008 | 8 |
![]() |
October 22, 2008 | 7 |
![]() |
October 20, 2008 | 6 |
![]() |
October 17, 2008 |
![]() |
|
October 17, 2008 |
![]() |
|
October 16, 2008 | 5 |
![]() |
October 15, 2008 | 4 |
![]() |
October 15, 2008 | 3 |
![]() |
October 14, 2008 | 2 |
![]() |
October 14, 2008 |
![]() |
|
October 14, 2008 |
![]() |
|
October 14, 2008 | 1 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Luxpro Corporation v. Apple, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Luxpro Corporation | |
Represented By: | Richard A. Adams |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Apple, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.