Peacock v. Miller County, Arkansas et al
| Antiono Peacock, Sr. |
| Miller County, Arkansas, Miller County Jail, Linda Rambo, Janice Nicholson and Dolly Simmons |
| 4:2009cv04005 |
| January 28, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
| Miller |
| Harry F. Barnes |
| Barry A. Bryant |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 28 Report and Recommendations, granting 27 Motion to Dismiss filed by Janice Nicholson, Dolly Simmons, Miller County, Arkansas, Linda Rambo. Plaintiff's Complaint against the Defendants is hereby dismissed based upon Plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of the Court and failure to prosecute this action. Signed by Honorable Harry F. Barnes on June 15, 2010. (cap)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER that 6 Answer to Complaint Referred (42:1983) filed by Dolly Simmons and Linda Rambo constitutes an answer on behalf of Miller County. The clerk is directed to note on the docket sheet that the answer filed on behalf of Sheriff Rambo also co nstitutes an answer on behalf of Miller County. Further, the clerk should note on the docket sheet that Miller County is represented by the same counsel as Sheriff Rambo. Attorney C. Burt Newell and Ralph C. Ohm added for Miller County, Arkansas. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on September 2, 2009. (cap)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
