Flowers v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

Plaintiff: Curtis - Flowers
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner
Case Number: 4:2009cv04037
Filed: April 20, 2009
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Texarkana Office
County: Miller
Presiding Judge: Barry A. Bryant
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 23, 2010 15 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER for Attorney Fees in the amount of $2,625.00 pursuant to the EAJA, 28 U.S.C 2412. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on November 23, 2010. (lw)
August 18, 2010 9 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on August 18, 2010. (cap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flowers v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Curtis - Flowers
Represented By: James R. Gowen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?