Texarkana, Arkansas, City of v. Texarkana, Texas, City of
Texarkana, Arkansas, City of |
Texarkana, Texas, City of |
4:2010cv04067 |
May 20, 2010 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Texarkana Office |
Miller |
Harry F. Barnes |
Other Contract |
09 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 69 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER; Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on July 6, 2012. (cnn) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Texarkana, Arkansas, City of v. Texarkana, Texas, City of | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Texarkana, Arkansas, City of | |
Represented By: | Ned A Stewart, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Texarkana, Texas, City of | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.