Thomas v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff: Austin Thomas
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Case Number: 4:2016cv04052
Filed: June 21, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Office: Texarkana Office
County: Nevada
Presiding Judge: Susan O. Hickey
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 45 U.S.C. ยง 51
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 38 JUDGMENT pursuant to Memorandum Opinion 37 granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion for Summary Judgment. Case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on August 7, 2018. (mll)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Austin Thomas
Represented By: James Ross Ferguson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?