Johnson v. Wolcott et al
Marcus Anthony Johnson |
Sheriff Robert Gentry, Chris Wolcott, Jailer Isaac Alvarado and Jail Administrator Chris Wolcott |
4:2018cv04162 |
December 3, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Susan O Hickey |
James R Marschewski |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on January 22, 2019. (mll) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. (mll) |
Filing 3 ORDER that the matter has been provisionally filed as the undersigned finds that additional information is needed to rule on Plaintiff's IFP application. Specifically the Court requires the following information: Certificate of Account. Failure to comply within the time period specified could result in summary dismissal for failure to obey a court order. Completed IFP due by 12/26/2018. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on December 3, 2018. (mll) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by Marcus Anthony Johnson. Motions referred to James R. Marschewski. (mll) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) against Isaac Alvarado, Robert Gentry, Chris Wolcott filed by Marcus Anthony Johnson. (mll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.