Hayes v. John Doe Officer et al
| Ron Wesley Hayes |
| Officer Henderson, Officer Golding, Officer Stutter, Sergeant Giffens, Captain Adams, Nurse King, Judge Wren Autry, Officer Cooper and John Doe Officer |
| 4:2019cv04061 |
| May 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Susan O Hickey |
| James R Marschewski |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. (mll) |
Filing 2
ORDER that the matter has been provisionally filed as the undersigned finds that additional information is needed to rule on Plaintiff's IFP application. Specifically the Court requires the following information: Completed IFP. Failure to comply within the time period specified could result in summary dismissal for failure to obey a court order. ORDER DIRECTING that an Amended Complaint be filed by 6/19/2019. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on May 31, 2019. (mll)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) against Captain Adams, Wren Autry, Officer Cooper, John Doe Officer, Sergeant Giffens, Officer Golding, Officer Henderson, Nurse King, Officer Stutter filed by Ron Wesley Hayes. (mll) (Main Document 1 replaced with correct document on 5/31/2019.) (mll). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
