Troxel v. Hopkins
| Marcella Troxel |
| Blythe Lane Hopkins |
| 4:2020cv04045 |
| June 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Susan O Hickey |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Blythe Lane Hopkins, Marcella Troxel. (Hornung, Nicholas) Modified to add joint filer on 7/27/2020. (mll) |
| Filing 7 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to be conducted by 7/16/2020. JOINT Rule 26(f) Meeting Report due by 7/23/2020. Jury Trial set for 7/19/2021 in Texarkana -- 3rd flr (AR side) before Honorable Susan O. Hickey. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on June 18, 2020. (rwg) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas D. Hornung on behalf of Blythe Lane Hopkins. (Hornung, Nicholas) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. (mll) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #3 Complaint with Jury Demand by Blythe Lane Hopkins.(mll) (Originally filed in state court.) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Blythe Lane Hopkins filed by Marcella Troxel. (Originally filed in state court.)(mll) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Blythe Lane Hopkins. (mll) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Miller County Circuit Court, case number 46CV-20-176. filed by Blythe Lane Hopkins. (Attachments: #1 Ex. A - State Court Documents)(mll) |
| TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE re Multiple Attorneys Listed on Pleading directed to Defendant Blythe Lane Hopkins. Notice of Removal #1 lists multiple attorneys appearing for the filer. The following attorney, who did not sign the pleading, must enter a separate Notice of Appearance in order to receive electronic notification of future activity in the case: Nicholas D. Hornung. (mll) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #1 Notice of Removal. You MUST pay the filing fee of $400.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 6/8/2020. (mll) |
| Notice of Removal filing fee paid re Clerk's Notice Regarding Filing Fee,, : $ 400, receipt number BARWDC-2155489.. (Drennon, Baxter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Troxel v. Hopkins | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marcella Troxel | |
| Represented By: | Jake Logan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Blythe Lane Hopkins | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas D. Hornung |
| Represented By: | Baxter D. Drennon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
