Sockwell v. Parker et al
| Kyrell Anthony Sockwell |
| Bryan McJunkin, Officer Greg Parker, Officer Dustin Wakefield, Chief Amy Marion and Sheriff Bryan McJunkin |
| 4:2021cv04023 |
| March 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Barry A Bryant |
| Susan O Hickey |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on May 10, 2021. (mll)
|
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable marked Return to sender. Paroled. Mail originally sent to Kyrell Anthony Sockwell at ADC - Cummins Unit including 6 Text Only Order Regarding Complaint Deficiency and Amended Complaint form. No new address available. New Address due by 5/5/2021. (mll) |
| Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable marked Return to sender. Not deliverable as addressed. Unable to forward. Mail originally sent to Kyrell Anthony Sockwell at ADC - Cummins Unit including #1 Complaint Referred (42:1983) filed by Kyrell Anthony Sockwell, #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, #3 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (42:1983), #4 Clerk's Order PLRA Fee, #5 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. No new address available. New Address due by 4/30/2021. (mll) |
| Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ORDER REGARDING COMPLAINT DEFICIENCY. After review of the Complaint, it is determined that the Plaintiff has not clearly stated how each named Defendant violated his federal constitutional rights, and some of his claims may be frivolous. In addition, on page two of the Complaint Plaintiff identifies himself as a Defendant and page three of the Complaint (where Plaintiff should have identified each Defendant and listed their place of employment and address) is missing. For these reasons, Plaintiff is directed to submit an Amended Complaint within 21 days of the date of this Order. The Clerk is directed to mail the Plaintiff a court-approved 1983 form.In the Amended Complaint, Plaintiff identify each individual Defendant and indicate their employer and address for service. Plaintiff must also write short, plain statements telling the Court: the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated;the name of the Defendant who violated the right;exactly what the Defendant did or failed to do;how the action or inaction of that Defendant is connected to the violation of the constitutional rights;and what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of the misconduct of that Defendant. See Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362,371-72,377 (1976);Fed.R.Civ.P.8. Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he has named as a Defendant. Plaintiff is CAUTIONED that he must affirmatively link the conduct of each named Defendant with the specific injury he suffered. If he fails to do so, the allegations against that Defendant will be dismissed for failure to state a claim.Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is a First Amended Complaint. The First Amended Complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its entirety on the court-approved form. You may not refer back to any part of the original complaint. A First Amended Complaint supersedes, or takes the place of, the original Complaint. After amendment, the Court will treat the original Complaint as nonexistent. Any cause of action that was raised in the original Complaint is waived if it is not raised in the First Amended Complaint. This case shall be subject to dismissal if Plaintiff fails to return the Amended Complaint to the Court by the deadline. Amended Complaint due by 4/6/2021. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on March 16, 2021. (mlf) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. (mll) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S ORDER re PLRA Fee directing ADC - Cummins Unit to collect from petitioner's prison account monthly payments in amount equal to 20% of preceding month's income credited to account until $350.00 filing fee is paid in full (cc: AR Board of Corrections, Compliance Division; Department of Correction, Trust Fund & Centralized Banking Office; Fiscal Manager, AR Department of Community Correction).(mll) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983). Pursuant to the provisions of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, the Clerk is directed to collect the filing fee from the Plaintiff.Plaintiff is advised that he is required to immediately inform the Court of any change of address. If Plaintiff is transferred to another jail or prison or released, he shall have 30 days from the date of transfer or release in which to notify the Court of the new address. Plaintiff shall submit a change of address on a separate piece of paper entitled Notice to the Court of Change of Address and not include any motions or otherwise request relief in this document. The notice shall contain only information pertaining to the address change. The case will be subject to dismissal if Plaintiff fails to inform the Court of an address change. The Clerk is directed to collect the filing fee in the amount of $350.00. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on March 15, 2021. (mll)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by Kyrell Anthony Sockwell. Motions referred to Barry A. Bryant.(mll) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) against Amy Marion, Bryan McJunkin, Greg Parker, Dustin Wakefield filed by Kyrell Anthony Sockwell.(mll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
