Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Texar Line Clearance, Inc.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) |
Texar Line Clearance, Inc. |
4:2021cv04061 |
September 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Susan O Hickey |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Texar Line Clearance, Inc. was sent waiver on 9/30/2021, answer due 11/29/2021. (Dixon, Pamela) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Melissa G. McPherson on behalf of All Defendants. (McPherson, Melissa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Brent Maurice Langdon on behalf of All Defendants. (Langdon, Brent) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel L. Herrington on behalf of Texar Line Clearance, Inc.. (Herrington, Daniel) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. (mll) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Texar Line Clearance, Inc., filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).(Dixon, Pamela) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Please proceed with filing your case initiating documents.If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day your case may be terminated. (mll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.