Sentry Select Insurance v. Ulrich et al
Sentry Select Insurance |
David Ulrich and Pro Trucking, Inc. |
4:2021cv04078 |
October 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Susan O Hickey |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER granting #7 Motion to Consolidate Cases. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on December 10, 2021. (mll) |
All future pleadings shall be filed in the LEAD case 20-4043.(mll) Modified on 12/13/2021 (cnn). |
Filing 11 RESPONSE IN SUPPORT OF Motion re #7 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Sentry Select Insurance. (Miller, Ronald) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sentry Select Insurance. (Miller, Ronald) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald C Miller on behalf of Sentry Select Insurance. (Miller, Ronald) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM BRIEF in Support of #7 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Pro Trucking, Inc., David Ulrich. (Deacon, Joseph) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Pro Trucking, Inc., David Ulrich. (Deacon, Joseph) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #3 Complaint with Jury Demand by Pro Trucking, Inc., David Ulrich.(Williams, John) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Barrett Deacon, Jr on behalf of Pro Trucking, Inc., David Ulrich. (Deacon, Joseph) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. (mll) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Pro Trucking, Inc., David Ulrich filed by Sentry Select Insurance. (Originally filed in state court.)(mll) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Pro Trucking, Inc., David Ulrich. (mll) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 46CV-21-144, case number Miller County Circuit Court, filed by David Ulrich, Pro Trucking, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Ex. A - State Court Documents)(mll) |
TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE re Multiple Attorneys Listed on Pleading directed to Defendants Pro Trucking, Inc., David Ulrich. Notice of Removal #1 lists multiple attorneys appearing for the filer. The following attorney, who did not sign the pleading, must enter a separate Notice of Appearance in order to receive electronic notification of future activity in the case: Barrett Deacon. (mll) |
TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE: The following attorney listed on Complaint #3 is not registered for CM/ECF noticing and filing in the Western District of Arkansas: Ronald C. Miller. An attorney can register through PACER for a CM/ECF login and password if they are admitted to practice in the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas or are admitted pro hac vice for this case. Any non-registered attorney should submit the proper attorney admission petition or file an appropriate motion. Please refer to our website http://www.arwd.uscourts.gov/attorney-information for further information. (mll) |
Notice of Removal filing fee paid re Clerk's Notice Regarding Filing Fee,, #1 Notice of Removal : $ 402, receipt number AARWDC-2485239.. (Williams, John) |
CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #1 Notice of Removal. You MUST pay the filing fee of $402.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 11/1/2021. (mll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.