Brown v. Windham
| Brion Day Shawn Brown |
| Nevada County Jail, Andrew Windham, Debra Jordan, Holly Egger and Amanda Andrews |
| 4:2022cv04039 |
| May 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Barry A Bryant |
| Susan O Hickey |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 USM 285 FORM/ SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brion Day Shawn Brown. Amanda Andrews, Holly Egger, Debra Jordan, Andrew Windham served on 6/6/2022, answers due 6/27/2022. (cnn) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by Amanda Andrews, Holly Egger, Debra Jordan, Andrew Windham.(Thomas, JaNan) |
| Filing 8 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to Amanda Andrews, Holly Egger, Debra Jordan, Andrew Windham and USM285 Forms delivered to USMS for each defendant for whom summons was issued with the following documents attached: re #6 Amended Complaint, #4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form, #7 Order Directing Service.(mll) |
Filing 7
ORDER DIRECTING THE MARSHALS SERVICE TO SERVE Amanda Andrews, Holly Egger, Debra Jordan, Andrew Windham and granting 21 days to answer. Signed by Honorable Barry A Bryant on May 19, 2022. (cc: U.S. Marshals Service).(mll)
|
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT as to #1 Complaint Referred (42:1983) against Andrew Windham, Amanda Andrews, Debra Jordan, Holly Egger, filed by Brion Day Shawn Brown. Related document: #1 Complaint Referred (42:1983) filed by Brion Day Shawn Brown.(bjb) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S ORDER re PLRA Initial Fee directing Nevada County Jail to collect from petitioner's prison account an initial partial filing fee of $30.00; thereafter to collect monthly payments from petitioner's prison account in amount equal to 20% of preceding month's income credited to account until $350.00 filing fee is paid in full (cc: Sheriff, Nevada County).(mll) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form.(mll) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983). Pursuant to the provisions of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, the Clerk is directed to collect the filing fee from the Plaintiff.Plaintiff is advised that he is required to immediately inform the Court of any change of address. If Plaintiff is transferred to another jail or prison or released, he shall have 30 days from the date of transfer or release in which to notify the Court of the new address. Plaintiff shall submit a change of address on a separate piece of paper entitled Notice to the Court of Change of Address and not include any motions or otherwise request relief in this document. The notice shall contain only information pertaining to the address change. The case will be subject to dismissal if Plaintiff fails to inform the Court of an address change. The Clerk is directed to collect the filing fee in the amount of $350.00; ORDER DIRECTING that an Amended Complaint be filed. (Amended Complaint due by 5/27/2022). Signed by Honorable Barry A Bryant on May 6, 2022.(mll)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by Brion Day Shawn Brown. Motions referred to Barry A Bryant.(mll) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) against Nevada County Jail filed by Brion Day Shawn Brown.(mll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
