Mitchell v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Plaintiff: Michael Wade Mitchell
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner
Case Number: 4:2023cv04005
Filed: February 1, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Barry A Bryant
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Social Security Administration Commissioner answer due 6/1/2023. Signed by Honorable Barry A Bryant on March 31, 2023.(mll)
March 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint by Social Security Administration Commissioner. (Curtis, Kizuwanda)
February 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint. Social Security Administration Commissioner served on 2/1/2023, answer due 4/3/2023.(mll)
February 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Honorable Barry A Bryant on February 1, 2023.(mll)
February 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT to U.S. Magistrate Judge by Michael Wade Mitchell. Government consent acknowledged pursuant to Standing Consent Letter. (Giles, Greg)
February 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF DIRECT ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE. This case has been assigned to a U.S. Magistrate Judge to conduct all proceedings and for entry of a final judgment. You must file the attached form memorializing consent or requesting reassignment to a District Judge within fourteen (14) days. Consent or Reassignment form due by 2/15/2023. (Attachments: #1 Mag Consent)(mll)
February 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , MOTION for Service by Michael Wade Mitchell. (Giles, Greg)
February 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration Commissioner, filed by Michael Wade Mitchell.(Giles, Greg)
February 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Michael Wade Mitchell. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document.If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day, this file may be closed.A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the Court (Fed.R.Civ.P.3).(mll)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchell v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Wade Mitchell
Represented By: Greg R. Giles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner
Represented By: Office of the General Counsel
Represented By: USAARW Social Security
Represented By: Candace L. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?