Dybalski v. Smith et al
Plaintiff: Garrett H Dybalski
Defendant: Daisy Smith, Karen Ghromley and Correctional Officer Cameron Shelton
Case Number: 4:2023cv04011
Filed: February 10, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Barry A Bryant
Referring Judge: Susan O Hickey
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on April 5, 2023.(mll)
March 30, 2023 Filing 10 Mail Returned as Undeliverable marked RTS - Not At Address. Mail originally sent to Garrett Dybalski at Hot Springs County Jail including 7 Order to Show Cause - Failure to Obey Order-TEXT ONLY. No new address available. (bjb)
March 20, 2023 Filing 9 Mail Returned as Undeliverable marked Return to sender. Attempted. Not Known. Mail originally sent to Garrett H. Dybalski at Hot Spring County Jail including 6 Order Regarding Complaint Deficiency. No new address available. New Address due by 4/19/2023.(mll)
March 20, 2023 TEXT ONLY MEMO OF REASSIGNMENT. Case referral reassigned to Honorable Christy D. Comstock. Honorable Barry A Bryant no longer assigned to the case. Motions referred to Christy D. Comstock.(src)
March 10, 2023 Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable marked Return to sender. Not deliverable as addressed. Unable to forward. Mail originally sent to Garrett H. Dybalski at Hot Spring County Jail including #4 Case Transferred In - District Transfer, #5 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. No new address available. New Address due by 4/10/2023.(mll)
March 7, 2023 Filing 7 TEXT ONLY SHOW CAUSE ORDER - FAILURE TO OBEY ORDER. The Court entered an Order directing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint by 3/6/23. This Order was not returned as undeliverable. Plaintiff did not respond. Plaintiff is given 21 days to show cause why he failed to obey the Order of the Court. If Plaintiff fails to respond by the deadline, this case shall be subject to dismissal. Show Cause Response due by 3/28/2023. Signed by Honorable Barry A Bryant on 3/7/23. (awl)
February 13, 2023 Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ORDER REGARDING COMPLAINT DEFICIENCY. After review of the Complaint, it is determined that the Plaintiff did not submit the complaint on the court-approved form for this District. For this reason, Plaintiff is directed to submit an Amended Complaint within 21 days of the date of this Order. The Clerk is directed to mail the Plaintiff a court-approved 1983 form.In the Amended Complaint, Plaintiff must write short, plain statements telling the Court: the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated;the name of the Defendant who violated the right;exactly what the Defendant did or failed to do;how the action or inaction of that Defendant is connected to the violation of the constitutional rights;and what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of the misconduct of that Defendant. See Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362,371-72,377 (1976);Fed.R.Civ.P.8. Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he has named as a Defendant. Plaintiff is CAUTIONED that he must affirmatively link the conduct of each named Defendant with the specific injury he suffered. If he fails to do so, the allegations against that Defendant will be dismissed for failure to state a claim.Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is a First Amended Complaint. The First Amended Complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its entirety on the court-approved form. You may not refer back to any part of the original complaint. A First Amended Complaint supersedes, or takes the place of, the original Complaint. After amendment, the Court will treat the original Complaint as nonexistent. Any cause of action that was raised in the original Complaint is waived if it is not raised in the First Amended Complaint. This case shall be subject to dismissal if Plaintiff fails to return the Amended Complaint to the Court by the deadline. CLERK TO FOLLOW UP Amended Complaint due by 3/6/2023. Additionally, Plaintiff is advised he cannot represent other Plaintiffs as he is not a lawyer. 28 U.S.C. Section 1654. Accordingly, he should not list Mr. Wolgamott, and Mr. Nichols as Plaintiffs in his Amended Complaint. The Court will send Mr. Wolgamott and Mr. Nichols separate mailings regarding their claims. Signed by Honorable Barry A Bryant on February 13, 2023. (awl)
February 10, 2023 Filing 5 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form.(mll)
February 10, 2023 Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Arkansas Eastern; Case Number 4:23-cv-00100. Docket sheet received.
February 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 TRANSFER ORDER directing that this case is immediately transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 2/10/2023. (kdr) [Transferred from ared on 2/10/2023.]
February 10, 2023 TEXT ONLY NOTICE: COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) transferred in from Eastern District of Arkansas.(mll)
February 10, 2023 MOTIONS REFERRED to Honorable Barry A. Bryant: #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Garrett H Dybalski. Motions referred to Honorable Barry A Bryant.(mll)
February 7, 2023 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Garrett H Dybalski.(kdr) [Transferred from ared on 2/10/2023.]
February 7, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Garrett H Dybalski. (kdr) [Transferred from ared on 2/10/2023.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dybalski v. Smith et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Garrett H Dybalski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daisy Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Karen Ghromley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Correctional Officer Cameron Shelton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?