Flowers v. Caremark PhC, L.L.C
| Kevin Flowers |
| Caremark PhC, L.L.C |
| 4:2024cv04031 |
| April 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Susan O Hickey |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form.(mll) |
| Filing 3 STATE COURT COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Caremark PhC, L.L.C filed by Kevin Flowers.(mll) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hempstead County Circuit Court, case number 29CV-24-43-2 filed by Caremark PhC, L.L.C. (Attachments: #1 Ex. A - State Court Docket, #2 Ex. B - State Court Notice of Removal)(mll) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Caremark PhC, L.L.C.(mll) |
| Notice of Removal filing fee paid re #2 Notice of Removal, Clerk's Notice Regarding Filing Fee,, : $ 405, receipt number AARWDC-2963846.. (Fairley, J.) |
| TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE re Multiple Attorneys Listed on Pleading directed to Defendant Caremark PhC, L.L.C. Notice of Removal #2 lists multiple attorneys appearing for the filer. The following attorneys, who did not sign the pleading, must enter a separate Notice of Appearance in order to receive electronic notification of future activity in the case: Michael D. Leffel, Frank Pasquesi.(mll) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #2 Notice of Removal. You MUST pay the filing fee of $405.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 4/22/2024.(mll) |
| TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE re Multiple Attorneys Listed on Pleading directed to Plaintiff Kevin Flowers. Complaint #3 lists multiple attorneys appearing for the filer. The following attorneys, who did not sign the pleading, must enter a separate Notice of Appearance in order to receive electronic notification of future activity in the case: Daniel Holland, Clay Ellis.(mll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Flowers v. Caremark PhC, L.L.C | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kevin Flowers | |
| Represented By: | Scott E. Poynter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Caremark PhC, L.L.C | |
| Represented By: | J. Carter Fairley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
