Blount v. Echols et al
| Christopher Don Blount |
| Echols, Carlton, Carter and Hunter Petray |
| 5:2007cv05046 |
| March 15, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Fayetteville Office |
| Benton |
| Jimm Larry Hendren |
| James R. Marschewski |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 34 . Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on April 24, 2009. (jn) Modified on 4/27/2009 to correct text (jn).
|
|
Filing
34
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint Referred (42:1983) filed by Christopher Don Blount. Objections to R&R due by 4/13/2009. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on March 27, 2009. (jn)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 22 ; granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Carlton, Hunter Petray, Carter, Echols, as set out in the order. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on September 24, 2008. (ct)
|
|
Filing
22
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 14 First MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Carlton, Hunter Petray, Carter, Echols. Objections to R&R due by 9/22/2008. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on September 4, 2008. (ct)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
