Osburn v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Eddie D. Osburn |
Social Security Administration Commissioner |
5:2007cv05112 |
June 22, 2007 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Fayetteville Office |
Washington |
Jimm Larry Hendren |
James R. Marschewski |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2008. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 and granting 10 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by Eddie D. Osburn. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on May 8, 2008. (ct) |
Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 10 First MOTION for Attorney Fees EAJA attorney fees filed by Eddie D. Osburn. Objections to R&R due by 4/25/2008. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on April 8, 2008. (ct) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re 10 First MOTION for Attorney Fees EAJA attorney fees filed by Social Security Administration Commissioner. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 Kimer R&R and Judgment)(Hawkins, Claude) |
CASE REFERRED to Honorable James R. Marschewski. Motions referred to James R. Marschewski.(cap) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM BRIEF in Support of 10 First MOTION for Attorney Fees EAJA attorney fees by Eddie D. Osburn. (Cazort, Mildred) |
Filing 10 First MOTION for Attorney Fees EAJA attorney fees by Eddie D. Osburn. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A Judgment, # 2 Exhibit B EAJA Billing Statement, # 3 Exhibit C Consumer Price Index)(Cazort, Mildred) |
Filing 9 JUDGMENT REMANDING CASE TO US AGENCY, ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 , granting 7 MOTION to Remand and Memorandum filed by Social Security Administration Commissioner. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on January 10, 2008. cc: to ALJ & OH&A w/copy of R&R(ct) Modified on 1/10/2008 to correct docket text(ct). |
Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 7 MOTION to Remand and Memorandum filed by Social Security Administration Commissioner Objections to R&R due by 12/17/2007. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on November 28, 2007. (ct) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Remand and Memorandum by Social Security Administration Commissioner. (Hawkins, Claude) |
Filing 6 APPEAL BRIEF (SOCIAL SECURITY) by Eddie D. Osburn. (Cazort, Mildred) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Social Security Administration Commissioner.(Hawkins, Claude) |
This is a text only entry - No Document is attached. Paper document filed with Clerk.SOCIAL SECURITY TRANSCRIPT by Social Security Administration Commissioner. Plaintiff's SSA Appeal Brief due by 10/26/2007. Government's SSA Appeal Brief due by 11/26/2007. (mfr) |
TEXT ONLY SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER. Plaintiff must file a brief within thirty (30) days of the date of the filing of the transcript or 10/26/2007. The brief must identify specific points for appeal. Plaintiff's failure to file a timely brief may result in dismissal for failure to prosecute. Defendant must file a brief within thirty (30) days of the date Plaintiff's brief is served. Defendant's brief must respond to the issues raised in Plaintiff's brief and may include additional relevant issues. The brief should be no longer than twenty (20) pages in length. Any brief exceeding the page limitation imposed herein may be stricken from the record.. Signed by Judge James R. Marschewski on 09/26/2007. (caz) |
Summons Issued as to Office of Regional Chief Counsel, Social Security Administration Commissioner, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General and returned to attorney for service (ct) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and directing the clerk to file the complaint nunc pro tunc as of June 14, 2007. The plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of the complaint and this order on the defendant by certified mail, return receipt requested, as well as the US Attorney General and US Attorney for Western District/Arkansas without prepayment of fees and costs. Defendant is to answer within 60 days from date of service. 0 summonses issued. . Signed by Judge James R. Marschewski on 06/19/07. (ct) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Eddie D. Osburn filed by Eddie D. Osburn re 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (ct) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eddie D. Osburn. (ct) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration Commissioner , filed by Eddie D. Osburn. Filed nunc pro tunc as of June 14, 2007 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A Notice of Appeals Council Action)(ct) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Osburn v. Social Security Administration Commissioner | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Eddie D. Osburn | |
Represented By: | Mildred M Cazort |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.