Lacy v. Ferguson et al
| Brandon Eugene Lacy |
| Keith Ferguson and Hunter Petray |
| 5:2007cv05200 |
| November 6, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Fayetteville Office |
| Benton |
| Jimm Larry Hendren |
| James R. Marschewski |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
JUDGMENT dismissing case with prejudice ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on November 23, 2009. (tg)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 38 and granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant Keith Ferguson is dismissed. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on March 17, 2009. (jn)
|
|
Filing
38
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 18 First MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Hunter Petray, Larkin, Keith Ferguson, Hernandez, Bryson, Duncan. Objections to R&R due by 3/16/2009. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on February 26, 2009. (jn)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER provisionally filing complaint prior to determination regarding plaintiff's status as a pauper and service of process. Clerk is directed to provide the plaintiff with an in forma pauperis application to complete by November 30, 2007. Signed by Judge James R. Marschewski on November 1, 2007. (tg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
