Seratt v. Seratt

Plaintiff: Rodger Seratt
Defendant: Timothy Seratt
Case Number: 5:2007cv05210
Filed: November 16, 2007
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Fayetteville Office
County: Benton
Presiding Judge: Jimm Larry Hendren
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 3, 2010 49 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 47 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 47 Motion to Alter Judgment. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on March 3, 2010. (tg)
March 6, 2009 46 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER finding as moot 35 Motion in Limine; granting 43 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 29 Motion for Sanctions. Case dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on March 6, 2009. (tg) Modified on 3/9/2009 to add text (jn).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Seratt v. Seratt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodger Seratt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy Seratt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?