Weaver v. Carlton et al
| Mark Weaver |
| Carlton, Hunter Petray, Carter and Jail Medical Staff |
| 5:2008cv05167 |
| July 25, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
| Benton |
| Jimm Larry Hendren |
| James R. Marschewski |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and dismissing case re: 54 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on February 22, 2010. (tg)
|
|
Filing
54
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 52 MOTION to Dismiss. Objections to R&R due by 1/21/2010. Signed by Honorable Erin L. Setser on January 4, 2010. (jn)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER dismissing as premature 34 Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and substituting Deputy Rankin for Deputy Rakin; Deputy Blagg for Deputy Blugg and Deputy Barr for Deputy Bar. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on August 21, 2009. (tg)
|
|
Filing
45
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 34 First MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Wales, Strickland, Blugg, Carter, Wright, Bar, Torres, Tucker, Engleman, Roland, Rakin, Johnson, Carlton, Lockhart, Elkington, Morrison, Johnston, Hunter Petray, Keith Ferguson, Ewing, Vaughn, Robbins, - Bailey. Objections to R&R due by 8/10/2009. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on July 21, 2009. (src)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
