Michael Allen Adams vs. Officer Dobbs
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Adams
Defendant:
Dobbs
Case Number:
5:2008cv05251
Filed:
November 20, 2008
Court:
Arkansas Western District Court
Office:
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office
County:
Washington
Presiding Judge:
Jimm Larry Hendren
Referring Judge:
James R. Marschewski
Nature of Suit:
None
Cause of Action:
Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
August 28, 2009 | 21 |
![]() |
August 10, 2009 | 20 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Michael Allen Adams vs. Officer Dobbs | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Allen Adams | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Dobbs | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.