Weston-Hill v. Murphy

Plaintiff: Joshua E Weston-Hill
Defendant: Anthony Murphy
Case Number: 5:2014cv05010
Filed: January 9, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Office: Fayetteville Office
County: U.S., Outside State
Presiding Judge: James R. Marschewski
Presiding Judge: P. K. Holmes
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2014 Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and Dismissing Case Without Prejudice. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on May 19, 2014. (src)
January 8, 2014 Filing 3 ORDER immediately transferring case to the Western District of Arkansas. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 1/8/2014. (ks) [Transferred from ared on 1/9/2014.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Weston-Hill v. Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua E Weston-Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthony Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?