Center v. Conagra Foods, Inc.

Plaintiff: Colby Center
Defendant: Conagra Foods, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2014cv05248
Filed: August 6, 2014
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Fayetteville Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: Timothy L. Brooks
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 6, 2015 54 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on July 6, 2015. (tg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Center v. Conagra Foods, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Colby Center
Represented By: Marcus Neil Bozeman
Represented By: Kenneth R Shemin
Represented By: Thomas P. Thrash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Conagra Foods, Inc.
Represented By: Kevin A. Crass
Represented By: Roger Christopher Lawson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?