Redman & Associates, LLC v. Sales Chief Ent. (Hong Kong) Co., LTD

Plaintiff: Redman & Associates, LLC
Defendant: Sales Chief Ent. (Hong Kong) Co., LTD
Case Number: 5:2014cv05277
Filed: September 5, 2014
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Fayetteville Office
County: Benton
Presiding Judge: Timothy L. Brooks
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 23, 2015 49 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 39 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on October 23, 2015. (jn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Redman & Associates, LLC v. Sales Chief Ent. (Hong Kong) Co., LTD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Redman & Associates, LLC
Represented By: Mark M. Henry
Represented By: Adam L. Hopkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sales Chief Ent. (Hong Kong) Co., LTD
Represented By: Richard T. Donovan
Represented By: Karen Turner-Fry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?