Chaney v. Cradduck et al
| James W. Chaney, Jr. |
| Kelley Cradduck, Cogbill, J. Martinez, Devore, John Doe Doctor, Amber Goff, John Doe Deputy, Hall and John Doe Deputies |
| 5:2014cv05352 |
| November 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Fayetteville Office |
| Benton |
| Timothy L. Brooks |
| James R. Marschewski |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
OPINION AND ORDER finding as moot 80 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 81 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 83 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 90 Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum and granting 91 Motion for Reconsideration. See order for specifics. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on May 1, 2017. (tg)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER ADOPTING 61 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and granting 50 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 53 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 56 Motion for Summary Judgment. Kelley Cradduck, Devore, J. Martinez, Catering by Marlins and Cogdill dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on August 17, 2016. (tg)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER adopting 41 Report and Recommendations and granting 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on October 9, 2015. (rg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
