Doe v. Bentonville School District et al
| Jane Doe |
| Bentonville School District, Michael Poore, Tanya Sharp, Brad Reed, Amy Simpson, Vista Health, Allen Morrison, Veronica Odum, Tom Kimbrell and Tony Wood |
| 5:2015cv05020 |
| January 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Fayetteville Office |
| U.S., Outside State |
| Timothy L. Brooks |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
194
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 185 Motion for Attorney Fees in favor of Jane Doe against Bentonville School District in the amount of $37,372.50 with court costs in the amount of $5,465.05. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on March 16, 2018. (tg)
|
|
Filing
184
OPINION AND ORDER denying 175 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on September 12, 2017. (tg)
|
|
Filing
164
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on March 15, 2016. (src)
|
|
Filing
110
OPINION AND ORDER denying 102 Motion to Consolidate Cases. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on November 24, 2015. (rg)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER OF TRANSFER: Pursuant to the 85 Opinion and Order entered separately today, the Clerk is directed to transfer this action to the Western District of Arkansas. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/22/2015. (ks)[Transferred from ared on 1/23/2015.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
