Lewis v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
| Michael Ray Lewis |
| TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma, Inc, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Pharma, Inc. and Actavis Inc. |
| 5:2017cv05118 |
| June 29, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Fayetteville Office |
| Sebastian |
| Timothy L Brooks |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS. Summons Issued as to Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc, TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and returned to attorney or plaintiff for service. (jn) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Furnished (jn) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Michael Ray Lewis. (jn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc, TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., filed by Michael Ray Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Exh 1, #2 Exh 2, #3 Exh 3, #4 Exh 4, #5 Exh 5, #6 Exh 6, #7 Exh 7, #8 Exh 8, #9 Exh 9, #10 Exh 10, #11 Exh 11, #12 Exh 12, #13 Exh 13, #14 Exh 14, #15 Exh 15, #16 Exh 16, #17 Exh 17)(jn) |
| Remark: Complaint and Docket Sheet sent to Clerk of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation via email. (jn) |
| TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE re Multiple Attorneys Listed on Pleading directed to Plaintiff Michael Ray Lewis. Complaint #1 lists multiple attorneys appearing for the filer. The following attorney(s), who did not sign the pleading, must enter a separate Notice of Appearance in order to receive electronic notification of future activity in the case: MARCUS NEIL BOZEMAN, KENNETH R. SHEMIN. (jn) |
| TEXT ONLY MEMO OF REASSIGNMENT. Case reassigned to Honorable Timothy L. Brooks. Honorable P. K. Holmes, III no longer assigned to the case. (jn) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #1 Complaint. You MUST pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 7/3/2017 (jn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
