Stripling v. University of Arkansas et al
Sara Stripling |
University of Arkansas, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture and University of Arkansas doing business as Division of Argiculture Research and Extension |
5:2018cv05148 |
July 25, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Fayetteville Office |
Washington |
Timothy L Brooks |
P K Holmes |
Labor: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Sara Stripling. (tg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against University of Arkansas, University of Arkansas(a Political Subdivision of the State of Arkansas), University of Arkansas(and the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas as a Public Body Corporate), University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, filed by Sara Stripling.(tg) |
CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #1 Complaint. You MUST pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 7/27/2018 (tg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.