Central United Methodist Church, Inc v. Barbstan Partners, LTD
| Central United Methodist Church, Inc |
| Barbstan Partners, LTD |
| 5:2018cv05174 |
| September 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| P K Holmes |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1442 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #23 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to November 5, 2018. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on October 26, 2018. (cds) |
| Filing 23 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #18 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by Central United Methodist Church, Inc. (Cate, Brandon) |
| Filing 22 FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER, as set forth. Bench Trial set for 7/15/2019 at 09:00 AM in Fayetteville -- 5th flr (Rm 509) before Honorable P. K. Holmes III. Signed by Jane Ann Short, Courtroom Deputy for Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on October 22, 2018. (jas) |
| Filing 21 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Central United Methodist Church, Inc. (Cate, Brandon) |
| Filing 20 ANSWER to #15 Amended Complaint,, by Barbstan Partners, LTD.(Johnson, Colin) |
| Filing 19 MEMORANDUM BRIEF in Support of #18 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by Barbstan Partners, LTD. (Johnson, Colin) |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by Barbstan Partners, LTD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1981 Amendment)(Johnson, Colin) |
| Filing 17 TEXT ONLY ORDER denying as moot, and without prejudice to its refiling, Defendant's #5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim in light of the filing of the #15 amended complaint. See In re Atlas Van Lines, Inc., 209 F.3d 1064, 1067 (8th Cir. 2000). Defendant's responsive pleading to the amended complaint is due by October 17, 2018. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on October 5, 2018. (rab) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Central United Methodist Church, Inc. (Cate, Brandon) |
| Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT as to #3 Complaint against Barbstan Partners, LTD , filed by Central United Methodist Church, Inc. Related document: #3 Complaint filed by Central United Methodist Church, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (1971 Lease), #2 Exhibit 2 (1981 Lease Amendment), #3 Exhibit 3 (April 6, 2014, E-Mail), #4 Exhibit 4 (April 7, 2014, E-Mails), #5 Exhibit 5 (May 27, 2014, Letter), #6 Exhibit 6 (Real Estate Contract), #7 Exhibit 7 (June 21, 2018, Letter), #8 Exhibit 8 (July 23, 2018, Letter))(Cate, Brandon) |
| Filing 14 SECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Barbstan Partners, LTD. Amendment to #1 Notice of Removal, #10 Amended Document Second Notice of Removal. (Johnson, Colin) Modified document title on 9/25/2018 (jas). |
| Filing 13 SECOND ORDER TO SUPPLEMENT directing that a response to this order or an amended notice of removal be filed. Document due in Response to Order by 10/1/2018. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on September 24, 2018. (tg) |
| Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Plaintiff's deadline to file a response/reply is extended to October 3, 2018. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on September 24, 2018. (cds) |
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Central United Methodist Church, Inc. (Cate, Brandon) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Barbstan Partners, LTD. Amendment to #1 Notice of Removal . (Johnson, Colin) Modified document title on 10/17/2018 (jas). |
Filing 9
ORDER DIRECTING that a response to this order or an amended notice of removal be filed. Document due in Response to Order by 9/27/2018 Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on September 13, 2018. (tg)
|
| Filing 8 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/19/2018. Bench Trial set for 7/15/2019 at 09:00 AM in Fayetteville -- 5th flr (Rm 509) before Honorable P. K. Holmes III. Signed by Jane Ann Short, Courtroom Deputy for Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on September 12, 2018. (jas) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #3 Complaint by Barbstan Partners, LTD.(Johnson, Colin) |
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM BRIEF in Support of #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Barbstan Partners, LTD. (Johnson, Colin) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Barbstan Partners, LTD. (Johnson, Colin) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by William Fitzgerald Clark on behalf of Barbstan Partners, LTD. (Clark, William) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Barbstan Partners, LTD, filed by Central United Methodist Church, Inc.(src) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Barbstan Partners, LTD. (src) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Washington County, AR, case number 72CV 18-2111. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 5006823), filed by Barbstan Partners, LTD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(src) |
| TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE re Multiple Attorneys Listed on Pleading directed to Defendant Barbstan Partners, LTD. Notice of Removal #1 lists multiple attorneys appearing for the filer. The following attorney(s), who did not sign the pleading, must enter a separate Notice of Appearance in order to receive electronic notification of future activity in the case: William F. Clark. (src) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
