Ledbetter v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
| Curt Ledbetter |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC |
| 5:2018cv05177 |
| September 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| P K Holmes |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ORDER: In light of the #8 stipulation filed by the parties, the Court finds good cause exists pursuant to Rule 4(m) to extend Defendant's time to answer or respond to the complaint to January 28, 2019. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on October 22, 2018. (rab) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Scott, Ralph) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Ralph Downing Scott, III on behalf of Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Scott, Ralph) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Roger D Rowe on behalf of Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Rowe, Roger) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Curt Ledbetter. Equifax Information Services, LLC served on 10/8/2018, answer due 10/29/2018. (Chami, David) |
| Filing 4 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to Equifax Information Services, LLC and returned to attorney or plaintiff for service. YOU MUST PRINT THIS ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH IS THE MAIN DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (lgd) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Furnished. (lgd) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Curt Ledbetter. (lgd) |
| Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Equifax Information Services, LLC, filed by Curt Ledbetter.(lgd) |
| Complaint filing fee paid re #1 Complaint : $ 400, receipt number AARWDC-1778979.. (Chami, David) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #1 Complaint. You MUST pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 9/14/2018 (lgd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ledbetter v. Equifax Information Services, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Equifax Information Services, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Roger D Rowe |
| Represented By: | Ralph Downing Scott, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Curt Ledbetter | |
| Represented By: | David Chami |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
