Thompson v. John Doe #1 et al
| William Curtis Thompson |
| Jane or John Doe Cook Supervisor, Sheriff Tim Helder, John or Jane Doe Charge Nurse, John Doe #1 and William Storey |
| 5:2019cv05110 |
| June 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Timothy L Brooks |
| Erin L Wiedemann |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by William Curtis Thompson. Sheriff Tim Helder served on 7/15/2019, answer due 8/5/2019. (tg) |
| Filing 11 TEXT ONLY ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE TO MOTION #8 TO DISMISS. On July 25, 2019, Sheriff Helder filed a Motion to Dismiss, along with a brief in support. Plaintiff is directed to respond to the motion.Plaintiff is advised that failure to timely and properly comply with this Order shall result in the dismissal of this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Response to Motion to Dismiss due by 8/15/2019. Signed by Honorable Erin L. Wiedemann on July 29, 2019. (smg) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint Referred (42:1983) with Jury Demand by Sheriff Tim Helder.(Davis, JaNan) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM BRIEF in Support of #8 First MOTION to Dismiss Case by Sheriff Tim Helder. (Davis, JaNan) |
| Filing 8 First MOTION to Dismiss Case by Sheriff Tim Helder. Motions referred to Erin L. Wiedemann.(Davis, JaNan) |
| Filing 7 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to Sheriff Tim Helder and USM285 Form(s) Delivered to USMS for each defendant for whom summons was issued with the following documents attached: re #1 Complaint Referred (42:1983), #4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form, #6 Order Directing Service. (tg) (tg). |
Filing 6
ORDER DIRECTING THE MARSHALS SERVICE TO SERVE Sheriff Tim Helder and granting 21 days to answer. Signed by Honorable Erin L. Wiedemann on July 9, 2019. (cc: U.S. Marshals Service-Certified).(tg)
|
| Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (IFP)(42:1983). When documents attached to the IFP application and complaint are considered together, it is clear that Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated and does not have sufficient funds to pay the filing fee. Signed by Honorable Erin L. Wiedemann on July 9, 2019. (smg) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form furnished. (tg) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER directing the Clerk to provisionally file the complaint submitted by the Plaintiff. A determination regarding his status as a pauper and service of process will be made at a later time. If Plaintiff is transferred to another jail or prison or released, he shall have 30 days from the date of transfer or release in which to notify the Court of his new address, ORDER DIRECTING that a Completed IFP be filed.( Completed IFP due by 6/25/2019). Signed by Honorable Erin L. Wiedemann on June 5, 2019. (tg)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by William Curtis Thompson. Motions referred to Erin L. Wiedemann.(tg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) against Sheriff Tim Helder, Jane or John Doe Cook Supervisor, John Doe #1, John or Jane Doe Charge Nurse and William Storey filed by William Curtis Thompson.(tg) Modified on 7/26/2019 to add defendant William Storey per SG (tg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
