Tomelleri v. Hodgson
| Joseph R. Tomelleri |
| Robert Hodgson and Robert Hodgson doing business as Fly Fishing Extreme |
| 5:2019cv05132 |
| July 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| P K Holmes |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/30/2019. Jury Trial set for 7/6/2020 09:00 AM in Fayetteville - 2nd flr (Rm 210) before Honorable P. K. Holmes III.Signed by Jane Ann Short, Courtroom Deputy for Honorable P. K. Holmes III on August 23, 2019. (jas) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Robert Hodgson.(Haines, Seth) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Oliver Peter Maguire on behalf of Joseph R. Tomelleri. (Maguire, Oliver) |
| Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Oliver Maguire is directed to immediately register for Pro Hac Vice filer access through PACER and enter his appearance in this matter. The requirement to designate local counsel pursuant to Local Rule 83.5(d) is waived for the limited purposes of this pending litigation. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes III on July 29, 2019. (jas) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Attorney Oliver Maguire to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Application fee paid $ 100; receipt number AARWDC-1953937) by Joseph R. Tomelleri. (Maguire, Oliver) |
| Filing 6 INITIAL REPORT ON THE FILING OF A COPYRIGHT ACTION for a case initiated by Joseph R. Tomelleri with the filing of #2 Complaint. (Strohm, Scott) |
| Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Scott J. Strohm appearing for Plaintiff. The requirement to designate local counsel pursuant to Local Rule 83.5(d) is waived for the limited purposes of this pending litigation. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes III on July 24, 2019. (jas) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Attorney Scott J. Strohm to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Application fee paid $ 100; receipt number AARWDC-1951599) by Joseph R. Tomelleri. (Strohm, Scott) |
| TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE: The following attorney(s) listed on Complaint #2 is (are) not registered for CM/ECF noticing and filing in the Western District of Arkansas:Steven Mustoe, Scott Strohm, and Oliver Maguire. An attorney can register through PACER for a CM/ECF login and password if they are admitted to practice in the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas or are admitted pro hac vice for this case. Any non-registered attorney should submit the proper attorney admission petition or file an appropriate motion. Please refer to our website http://www.arwd.uscourts.gov/attorney-information for further information. (src) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. (tg) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Robert Hodgson ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AARWDC-1947769), filed by Joseph R. Tomelleri.(Gray, Travis) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Joseph R. Tomelleri. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document(s). (tg) |
| TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE to attorney(s) filing a complaint or amended complaint in a Copyright action: Please complete AO Form 121 found on the Court's website (www.arwd.uscourts.gov -> ONLINE FORMS) and file it with the Court using Other Filings-Other Documents-Initial Report.Copyright/Patent/Trademark Report due 8/7/2019. (tg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
