Ormsby et al v. Cellco Partnership et al
Carolyn L. Ormsby and David Ormsby |
Mr. Entimo G., John Does 1-5, Mr. Lou, Mr. Austin, Mr. Lindsay, Cellco Partnership and Mr. Rick |
5:2020cv05019 |
January 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
P K Holmes |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 STATE COURT AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Mr. Austin, Mr. Rick, Mr. Lou, John Does 1-5, Mr. Entimo G., Mr. Lindsay, Cellco Partnership, filed by Carolyn L. Ormsby, David Ormsby. State Court Summons and Exhibits(lgd) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Cellco Partnership. (lgd) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Benton County Circuit Court, case number 04CV-19-2485, filed by Cellco Partnership. (Attachments: #1 State Court Amended Complaint, summons, exhibits,)(lgd) |
CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #1 Notice of Removal. You MUST pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 1/23/2020 (lgd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.