Miller v. Summit Commissary
Carlton Randell Miller |
Summit Commissary |
5:2020cv05033 |
February 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Timothy L Brooks |
Mark E Ford |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Mail Returned as Undeliverable marked No longer at faciility. Mail originally sent to Carlton Miller at Washington County Jail including #12 Order - Memo. No new address available. (lgd) |
Filing 13 Mail Returned as Undeliverable marked RTS Inmate no longer here. Mail originally sent to Carlton Miller at Washington County Jail including #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (42:1983) filed by Carlton Randell Miller. No new address available. (lgd) |
Filing 12 OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to place a strike flag on the case. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on March 30, 2020. (lgd) |
Filing 11 CLERK'S ORDER re PLRA Initial Fee directing Sheriff, Washington County to collect from petitioner's prison account an initial partial filing fee of $16.23; thereafter to collect monthly payments from petitioner's prison account in amount equal to 20% of preceding month's income credited to account until $ 350.00 filing fee is paid in full (cc: Sheriff, Washington County). (tg) |
Filing 10 TEXT ONLY ORDER finding as moot #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983). Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on March 16, 2020.(gg) |
Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ORDER finding as moot #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983). Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on March 16, 2020. (gg) |
Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (IFP)(42:1983). The two other motions to proceed IFP #2 and #5 are denied as moot. Both were incomplete. Pursuant to the provisions of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, the Clerk is directed to collect the filing fee from the Plaintiff.Plaintiff is advised that he is required to immediately inform the Court of any change of address. If Plaintiff is transferred to another jail or prison or released, he shall have 30 days from the date of transfer or release in which to notify the Court of the new address. Plaintiff shall submit a change of address on a separate piece of paper entitled Notice to the Court of Change of Address and not include any motions or otherwise request relief in this document. The notice shall contain only information pertaining to the address change. The case will be subject to dismissal if Plaintiff fails to inform the Court of an address change. The Clerk is directed to collect the filing fee in the amount of $ 350.00. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on March 16, 2020. (smg) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by Carlton Randell Miller. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(lgd) |
Set Deadlines: Completed IFP due by 3/23/2020 per Text Only Order dated 3/6/2020. (tg) |
Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ORDER. Plaintiff has filed two applications to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). The first motion #2 contained only the first page of the application. The second motion #5 contained the completed application but did not have the certificate regarding his inmate account attached. Without the certificate, the IFP motion is incomplete. Plaintiff is again directed to file a complete IFP application which includes the two page application and the certificate regarding his inmate account. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank IFP application.Plaintiff is given until March 23, 2020, to file the completed application. If he fails to obey this order, the case shall become subject to dismissal.Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on March 6, 2020. (smg) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by Carlton Randell Miller. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(lgd) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form furnished. (lgd) |
Filing 3 ORDER that the matter has been provisionally filed as the undersigned finds that additional information is needed to rule on Plaintiff's IFP application. Specifically the Court requires the following information: completed IFP. Failure to comply within the time period specified could result in summary dismissal for failure to obey a court order. Completed IFP due by 3/6/2020. Signed by Honorable Erin L. Wiedemann on February 18, 2020. (lgd) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by Carlton Randell Miller. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(lgd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) against Summit Commissary, filed by Carlton Randell Miller.(lgd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Miller v. Summit Commissary | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Summit Commissary | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Carlton Randell Miller | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.