Northwest Arkansas Conservation Authority v. Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc. et al
Northwest Arkansas Conservation Authority |
USI Consulting Engineers, Inc., Charles R. Nickle, Fidelity & Deposit Co. Of Maryland, Terry Carpenter, Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc. and Robert Britton Vance |
5:2020cv05047 |
March 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
P K Holmes |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Letter regarding remand sent to Benton County Circuit Clerk. (lgd) |
Filing 11 ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT; pending motions are TERMINATED AS MOOT. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes III on March 18, 2020. (lgd) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM BRIEF in Support of #9 MOTION to Dismiss by Fidelity & Deposit Co. Of Maryland. (Butt, William) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by Fidelity & Deposit Co. Of Maryland. (Butt, William) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM BRIEF in Support of #7 MOTION to Dismiss by Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc.. (Butt, William) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc.. (Butt, William) |
Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc., Fidelity & Deposit Co. Of Maryland. (Everett, John) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by John C. Everett on behalf of Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc., Fidelity & Deposit Co. Of Maryland. (Everett, John) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (tg) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed in State Court against Terry Carpenter, Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc., Fidelity & Deposit Co. Of Maryland, Charles R. Nickle, USI Consulting Engineers, Inc., Robert Britton Vance, filed by Northwest Arkansas Conservation Authority.(tg) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc., Fidelity & Deposit Co. Of Maryland. (tg) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Benton County, Arkansas, case number 04CV-20-270., filed by Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc., Fidelity & Deposit Co. Of Maryland. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 State Court Pleadings, #3 State Court Request for Admisisons)(tg) |
Notice of Removal filing fee paid re #1 Notice of Removal, : $ 400, receipt number AARWDC-2104166.. (Butt, William) |
CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #1 Notice of Removal,. You MUST pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 3/19/2020 (tg) |
TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE re Multiple Attorneys Listed on Pleading directed to Defendants Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc., Fidelity & Deposit Co. Of Maryland. Notice of Removal, #1 lists multiple attorneys appearing for the filer. The following attorney(s), who did not sign the pleading, must enter a separate Notice of Appearance in order to receive electronic notification of future activity in the case: DON A. TAYLOR, WILLIAM F. CLARK and JOHN C. EVERETT. (tg) |
TEXT ONLY CLERK'S ORDER requiring parties to request a trial by jury within 14 days from date of this order, if desired and allowed by law. (tg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.