Warren v. Arnold et al
Plaintiff: Richard Elmo Warren
Defendant: Jail ATM Visitation Transaction Site, Lieutenant Amanda Arnold and Summit
Case Number: 5:2020cv05105
Filed: June 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Timothy L Brooks
Referring Judge: Erin L Wiedemann
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2020 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed Amanda Arnold served on 7/28/2020, answer due 8/18/2020. (src)
July 14, 2020 Filing 9 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to Amanda Arnold and USM285 Form(s) Delivered to USMS for each defendant for whom summons was issued with the following documents attached: re #1 Complaint, #8 Order Directing Service, #4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. (lgd)
July 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DIRECTING THE MARSHALS SERVICE TO SERVE Amanda Arnold and granting 21 days to answer. Signed by Honorable Erin L. Wiedemann on July 14, 2020. (cc: U.S. Marshals Service-Certified).(lgd)
July 6, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address for Richard Warren to Atwater, CA. Documents that have previously been returned are being resent including #5 Clerk's Order PLRA Initial Fee, #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983), #3 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (42:1983), Add and Terminate Parties, #4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. (tg)
July 2, 2020 Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable marked no longer at facility. Mail originally sent to Richard Warren at Washington County Jail including #1 Complaint filed by Richard Elmo Warren, #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (42:1983) filed by Richard Elmo Warren, #3 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (42:1983) Resent to Victorville USP. (lgd)
June 17, 2020 Filing 5 CLERK'S ORDER re PLRA Initial Fee directing Washington County Jail to collect from petitioner's prison account an initial partial filing fee of $110.70; thereafter to collect monthly payments from petitioner's prison account in amount equal to 20% of preceding month's income credited to account until $ 350 filing fee is paid in full (cc: AR Board of Corrections, Compliance Division; Department of Correction, Trust Fund & Centralized Banking Office; Fiscal Manager, AR Department of Community Correction). (lgd)
June 16, 2020 TEXT ONLY NOTICE: COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983). Filed for ECF Purposes Only (src)
June 16, 2020 Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form Furnished. (tg)
June 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983). Pursuant to the provisions of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, the Clerk is directed to collect the $350.00 filing fee from the Plaintiff. The Clerk is directed to attach a Certificate of Account with the IFP Application.Plaintiff is advised that he is required to immediately inform the Court of any change of address. If Plaintiff is transferred to another jail or prison or released, he shall have 30 days from the date of transfer or release in which to notify the Court of the new address. Plaintiff shall submit a change of address on a separate piece of paper entitled Notice to the Court of Change of Address and not include any motions or otherwise request relief in this document. The notice shall contain only information pertaining to the address change. The case will be subject to dismissal if Plaintiff fails to inform the Court of an address change. The Clerk is directed to terminate Jail ATM Visitation Transaction Site as a Defendant. Signed by Honorable Erin L. Wiedemann on June 16, 2020. (tg)
June 16, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by Richard Elmo Warren. Motions referred to Erin L. Wiedemann.(tg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/16/2020: #1 Certificate of Account) (tg).
June 16, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Amanda Arnold, Jail ATM Visitation Transaction Site, Summit, filed by Richard Elmo Warren.(tg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Warren v. Arnold et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jail ATM Visitation Transaction Site
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lieutenant Amanda Arnold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Summit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Elmo Warren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?