Ray v. Gentry
| Warden Gentry and Leslie Rutledge |
| Eric Ray |
| 5:2021cv05008 |
| January 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Mark E Ford |
| P K Holmes |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM BRIEF in Support of #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Leslie Rutledge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Felony Information, #2 Exhibit B - Order and Warrant, #3 Exhibit C - Nolle Prosequi Order)(Kemp, Rachel) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Leslie Rutledge. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(Kemp, Rachel) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Eric Ray. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(lgd) |
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Request for Documents. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on February 26, 2021. (src)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to request copy of documents by Eric Ray. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(lgd) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Leslie Rutledge answer due 3/9/2021. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on February 18, 2021. (lgd)
|
| Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Leslie Rutledge. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(Kemp, Rachel) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Leslie Rutledge, Office of Attorney General by Eric Ray (no date given). (tg) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel M. Kemp on behalf of Leslie Rutledge. (Kemp, Rachel) |
| CERTIFIED MAIL, WITH RETURN RECEIPTS ATTACHED, DELIVERED TO U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, for service of #3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form, #6 Order Directing Service, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as to the Attorney General of the State of Arkansas, Leslie Rutledge using Certified Mail Article numbers 70172680000054175368, and 70172680000054175375. (2 envelopes) (lgd) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 and #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is advised that he is required to immediately inform the Court of any change of address. If Plaintiff is transferred to another jail or prison or released, he shall have 30 days from the date of transfer or release in which to notify the Court of the new address. Plaintiff shall submit a change of address on a separate piece of paper entitled Notice to the Court of Change of Address and not include any motions or otherwise request relief in this document. The notice shall contain only information pertaining to the address change. The case will be subject to dismissal if Plaintiff fails to inform the Court of an address change. ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO SERVE Attorney General of the State of Arkansas by certified mail and granting 21 days to answer. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on January 26, 2021. (lgd)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by Eric Ray. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(lgd) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING that a Completed IFP be filed. Completed IFP due by 2/13/2021. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on January 13, 2021. (tg)
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (src) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eric Ray. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(src) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Eric Ray.(src) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
