Kersey v. Olympic Channel Services S.L. et al
| Jack Kersey |
| Does 1-10 and Olympic Channel Services S.L. |
| 5:2021cv05040 |
| February 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| P K Holmes |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Complaint fee received: $ 402, receipt number AARWDC-2343819. (src)
|
|
Filing 3
Magistrate Notice/Consent Form furnished. (lgd)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Does 1-10, Olympic Channel Services S.L., filed by Jack Kersey.(lgd)
|
|
Filing 1
CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Jack Kersey. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document(s).If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day your case may be terminated. (lgd)
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #2 Complaint. You MUST pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 3/1/2021 (lgd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
