Southgate Shopping Center, Inc. v. The Cincinnati Casualty Company
| Southgate Shopping Center, Inc. |
| The Cincinnati Casualty Company |
| 5:2021cv05042 |
| March 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| P K Holmes |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER, as set forth. Jury Trial set for 2/14/2022 09:00 AM in Fayetteville - 2nd flr (Rm 210) before Honorable P. K. Holmes III. Signed by Jane Ann Short, Courtroom Deputy for Honorable P. K. Holmes III on April 29, 2021. (jas) |
| Filing 10 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Southgate Shopping Center, Inc.. (Doyle, Benjamin) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Southgate Shopping Center, Inc.. The Cincinnati Casualty Company served on 3/19/2021, answer due 4/9/2021. (Doyle, Benjamin) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/29/2021. Jury Trial set for 2/14/2022 09:00 AM in Fayetteville - 2nd flr (Rm 210) before Honorable P. K. Holmes III. Signed by Jane Ann Short, Courtroom Deputy for Honorable P. K. Holmes III on March 22, 2021. (jas) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by The Cincinnati Casualty Company.(Strauss, Scott) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott Michael Strauss on behalf of The Cincinnati Casualty Company. (Strauss, Scott) |
| Filing 5 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to The Cincinnati Casualty Company and returned to attorney or plaintiff for service. YOU MUST PRINT THIS ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH IS THE MAIN DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (src) |
| Filing 4 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS. Summons Requested as to The Cincinnati Casualty Company for service of the following document: #2 Complaint. (Doyle, Benjamin) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form furnished. (lgd) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand Southgate Shopping Center, Inc. against The Cincinnati Casualty Company ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AARWDC-2345094), filed by Southgate Shopping Center, Inc..(Doyle, Benjamin) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Southgate Shopping Center, Inc.. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document(s).If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day your case may be terminated. (lgd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Southgate Shopping Center, Inc. v. The Cincinnati Casualty Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Southgate Shopping Center, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin D. Doyle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Cincinnati Casualty Company | |
| Represented By: | Scott Michael Strauss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
