Garcia-Chicol v. Payne
Plaintiff: Jose Rufino Garcia-Chicol
Defendant: Dexter Payne
Case Number: 5:2021cv05089
Filed: May 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Christy D Comstock
Referring Judge: P K Holmes
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2021 Filing 8 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Dexter Payne. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - AR Supreme Ct. Opinion on Direct Appeal, #2 Exhibit 2 - AR Supreme Ct. Mandate, #3 Exhibit 3 - Direct Appeal Brief, #4 Exhibit 4 - Direct Appeal Response Brief, #5 Exhibit 5 - Reply Brief, #6 Exhibit 6 - Petition for Rehearing, #7 Exhibit 7 - Response to Petition for Rehearing, #8 Exhibit 8 - Petition for Writ of Certiorari, #9 Exhibit 9-Part 1 - Trial Court Record, #10 Exhibit 9-Part 2 - Trial Court Record, #11 Exhibit 9-Part 3 - Trial Court Record, #12 Exhibit Index)(Warthen, Chris)
June 7, 2021 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF SERVICE: CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED for service of documents as set forth in #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Order Directing Service. Leslie Rutledge received documents on (no date given). (tg)
May 24, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Chris R. Warthen on behalf of Dexter Payne. (Warthen, Chris)
May 24, 2021 Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE OF SERVICE: CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED for service of documents as set forth in #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis,, Order Directing Service. M. Brockmen, ADC received documents on 5/21/2021. (lgd)
May 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO SERVE by certified mail, return receipt to Dexter Payne and the Attorney General of the State of Arkansas and granting 21 days to answer. Signed by Honorable Christy D. Comstock on May 18, 2021. (tg)
May 18, 2021 CERTIFIED MAIL, WITH RETURN RECEIPT ATTACHED, DELIVERED TO U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, for service of #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Order Directing Service, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as to Dexter Payne and Leslie Rutledge using Certified Mail Article numbers 7017 2680 0000 5417 5474 and 7017 2680 0000 5417 5481. (tg)
May 17, 2021 Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (tg)
May 17, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and for Service by Jose Rufino Garcia-Chicol. Motions referred to Christy D. Comstock.(tg) Modified on 5/18/2021 (tg).
May 17, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jose Rufino Garcia-Chicol.(tg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garcia-Chicol v. Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dexter Payne
Represented By: Chris R. Warthen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose Rufino Garcia-Chicol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?