BCG Masonic Cleveland, LLC et al v. Myeress
| BCG Masonic Cleveland, LLC and Beaty Capital Group, Inc. |
| Joe Myeress |
| 5:2021cv05179 |
| October 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Timothy L Brooks |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to Joe Myeress and returned to attorney or plaintiff for service. YOU MUST PRINT THIS ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH IS THE MAIN DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (src) |
| Filing 4 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS. Summons Requested as to Joe Myeress for service of the following document: #2 Complaint,. (Scott, John) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (tg) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Joe Myeress ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AARWDC-2473526), filed by BCG Masonic Cleveland, LLC, Beaty Capital Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Demand Letter, #2 Exhibit 2(a) - Facebook Post, #3 Exhibit 2(b) - Instagram Post)(Scott, John) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by BCG Masonic Cleveland, LLC, Beaty Capital Group, Inc. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document(s).If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day your case may be terminated. (tg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
